Then in your evidence for this claim you say that teacher asked four questions and then after each mating activity her questions were directed to males and females and she wasn't favoring any particular group of students. First if you are going to make this claim that effective teachers ask questions in order to gain knowledge the evidence must be related to how or what did you observed that showed that the questions gave knowledge- such as the students responded appropriately or something to that extend. Then you follow that evidence up with she did not favor males over females- I did not see any data in the summary of the observation that would support that. I actually found that Marilyn Havlik directed questions to boys by their names. Hence, I did find that most of us agreed on the fact that we will use a non-directive approach for this teacher. Also some of the claims seemed to correlate among us. One more thing- this question is actually directed for Mike, I noticed in some that people wrote what type of approach they will use with this teacher in the pre-observation conference with out having yet observed her. Is an observer able to tell from the pre-observation conference what type of approach they would take? Please elaborate or direct me to where I can find the answer?
[to all, have a great summer]
